Categories
Berit Osnes Employment Law Equinor Fraud Gareth Jones Gottfred Langseth Holly Hobson Houston Human Resources John Barnard Jon Erik Reinhardsen Joshua May London Marine Seismic Acquisition Nathan Oliver Norway PGS ASA PGS Exploration (UK) Limited Philip Simon Landau Rob Adams Rune Olav Pedersen Sarah Murphy Telenor Uncategorized Weybridge

PGS ASA 2021 Annual Report Commentary

Shareholders must demand that PGS ASA honor their contracts and stop their theft and misuse of company resources

Legally Protected Public Disclosure PGS ASA Illegally Responds/Retaliates (Silence = Fraud)

pgs asa john francas fraud extortion

SDK PININTEREST Q1 2022

London-Landau-Law.com Blogs

SeismicRiskManagement.com Blogs

pgs asa rune olav pedersen damian kelly watson farley williams landau law

pgs asa rune olav pedersen thailand duensing kippen

No PGS ASA Executive has ever taken legal action and denied public accusations that they are criminals even though contractual Confidentiality clauses should protect them from disparaging publications.

pgs asa ceo rune olav pedersen

pgs asa cfo gottfred langseth

pgs asa cfo gottfred langseth thailand duensing kippen

pgs asa john francas thailand duensing kippen

PGS ASA is knowingly illegally uttering forged and defamatory personnel records which were created to support an illegal settlement contract to terminate the employment of a foreign worker victim of crimes and whistleblower under false pretenses.

pgs asa evp nathan oliver gareth jones

pgs asa simon cather africa fraud watson farley williams

PGS ASA has misrepresented / defrauded global government data protection and immigration agencies with the aid of bribed legal firms/lawyers such as Watson Farley & Williams, LZW Law / Landau Law in England and Duensing – Kippen in Thailand.

pgs asa evp berit osnes audit

PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams, and LZW / Landau Law have not honored their contracts with Tier 2 visa sponsored foreign worker. PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams, and LZW / Landau Law conspired and misrepresented / mishandled legally protected public disclosure – whistleblowing to protect criminals.

pgs asa evp rob adams reksnes

pgs asa rob adams watson farley williams landau law

pgs asa operations per arild reksnes rob adams

PGS ASA does not respond to legally protected public disclosure claims, as defined by the UK Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA), but instead sought to destroy public allegations of criminal behavior so that they could continue to deceive shareholders.

pgs asa watson farley & williams tier 2 pinto richards jones fraud

PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams, and LZW / Landau Law criminally pervert the course of justice to escape accountability for their decisions even though they acknowledge the publications negatively impact company reputation and value.

London / Leeds Employment Lawyer Damian Kelly Advised Me

pgs asa rune olav pedersen damian kelly fraud

###

Categories
Berit Osnes Employment Law Equinor Fraud Gareth Jones Gottfred Langseth Holly Hobson Houston Human Resources John Barnard Jon Erik Reinhardsen Joshua May London Marine Seismic Acquisition Nathan Oliver Norway PGS ASA PGS Exploration (UK) Limited Philip Simon Landau Rob Adams Sarah Murphy Settlement Contracts Telenor Uncategorized Weybridge

Argentum’s Corrupt Candida Pinto and the Lawless Lawyer Racket

MarineSeismicSurvey.com Blogs

SeismicRiskManagement.com Blogs

PINTEREST SDK Q1 2022 – PGS – Landau Law – WFW

PINTEREST SDK PGS ASA Candida Pinto

pgs asa rune olav pedersen corruption

candida pinto argentum pgs asa corruption

candida pinto argentum pgs asa landau law

candida pinto argentum pgs asa watson farley & williams

candida pinto argentum pgs asa landau law

argentum candida pinto pgs asa simon cather

argentum law candida pinto pgs asa reinhardsen

argentum law candida pinto pgs asa gottfred langseth

pgs asa watson farley & williams dtn ben kelly argentum candida pinto

pgs asa watson farley & williams rhodri Thomas dentons

candida pinto argentum pgs asa carl richards duensing kippen

candida pinto argentum pgs asa ben kelly watson farley & williams auluk

simpson millar damian Kelly kalavity

###

Categories
Berit Osnes Employment Law Equinor Fraud Gareth Jones Gottfred Langseth Holly Hobson Houston Human Resources John Barnard Jon Erik Reinhardsen Joshua May London Marine Seismic Acquisition Nathan Oliver Norway PGS ASA PGS Exploration (UK) Limited Philip Simon Landau Rob Adams Rune Olav Pedersen Sarah Murphy Telenor Uncategorized Weybridge

London / Leeds Employment Lawyer Damian Kelly Advised Me

Damian Kelly says that everything is okay with the PGS Exploration (UK) Limited and SDK 5 December 2013 settlement contract. Kelly knows what to do if he feels disparaged!

PGS ASA / PGS Exploration (UK) Limited, Watson Farley & Williams, and Landau Law (LZW) have never claimed SDK publications disparaging per 5 December 2013 contract?

MarineSeismicSurvey.com

SeismicRiskManagement.com

London-Landau-Law.com

Pinterest by SDK aimed at Conspirators

london landau law damian kelly

pgs asa corruption

Bribed solicitors within the London Employment Law Racket pervert the course of justice and provide illegal advice to protect the corrupt and harm whistleblowers and their family‘s

Compliance and Risk Management

watson farley & williams risk and compliance neeta auluk

london landau law

pgs asa damian kelly

watson farley & williams risk and compliance daphne bjerke

Damian Kelly
National Head of Employment Law at Simpson Millar

watson farley & williams rhodri thomas

The PGS Exploration (UK) Limited and SDK 5 December 2013 settlement contract advised on by Philip Landau and Holly Hobson confidentiality terms have never been invoked because it is fraudulent and supported by forged and defamatory personnel records. Damian Kelly perverts the course of justice and aids and abets criminal abusers who defraud whistleblowers and UK government agencies.

pgs asa rob adams

equinor jon erik reinhardsen pgs asa

equinor jon erik reinhardsen pgs asa

argentum candida pinto pgs asa

Candida Pinto Argentum Legal Team Member

candida pinto argentum pgs asa watson farley & williams

candida pinto argentum pgs asa watson farley & williams

sarah murphy pgs asa watson farley & williams

joshua may pgs asa watson farley & williams

john francas pgs asa watson farley & williams landau law

gareth jones pgs asa watson farley & williams houston

gareth jones pgs asa duensing kippen houston

gareth jones pgs asa duensing kippen landau law

daphne bjerke pgs asa duensing kippen landau law

daphne bjerke pgs asa criminal

rune olav pedersen pgs asa criminal landau law watson farley & williams

###

Categories
Berit Osnes Employment Law Equinor Fraud Gareth Jones Gottfred Langseth Holly Hobson Houston Human Resources John Barnard Jon Erik Reinhardsen Joshua May London Marine Seismic Acquisition Nathan Oliver Norway PGS ASA PGS Exploration (UK) Limited Philip Simon Landau Rob Adams Rune Olav Pedersen Sarah Murphy Settlement Contracts Telenor Uncategorized Weybridge

Corrupt Global Law Firm Dentons Defrauds Upstream Investors

PGS ASA Bård Stenberg

candida pinto argentum law

dentons london rhodri thomas wfw passport tier 2

watson farley wiliams pgs asa dtn ben kelly

pgs asa rune olav pedersen ceo

watson farley williams neeta auluk dentons rhodri thomas

dentons london sewell rhodri thomas

pgs asa evp rob adams weybridge watson farley williams thomas

pgs asa Bård Stenberg watson farley williams dentons

watson farley wiliams em law dentons rhodri thomas

rhodri thomas london employment law pgs bjerke

dentons rhodri thomas london hse

###

Categories
Berit Osnes Employment Law Equinor Fraud Gareth Jones Gottfred Langseth Holly Hobson Houston Human Resources John Barnard Jon Erik Reinhardsen Joshua May London Marine Seismic Acquisition Nathan Oliver Norway PGS ASA PGS Exploration (UK) Limited Philip Simon Landau Rob Adams Rune Olav Pedersen Sarah Murphy Settlement Contracts Telenor Weybridge

About Dentons Corrupt Partner Rhodri Thomas

MarineSeismicSurvey.com

SeismicRiskManagement.com

Mobbing: Death by a Thousand Cuts

Mobbing: At the Mercy of the Mob

Rhodri Thomas is an accused criminal who accepted bribes as a Senior Solicitor with Watson Farley & Williams to illegally terminate a foreign worker whistleblower.  Thomas uttered forged and defamatory personnel records to support an illegal settlement contract. 

The contract that Rhodri Thomas formed between PGS Exploration (UK) Limited and SDK 5 December 2013 while working with Watson Farley & Williams contains Confidentiality clauses which prohibit the publication of content that is disparaging to parties of the contract. Thomas has never acted on these clauses and has allowed his own as well as other stakeholders to be disparaged.

SDK has evidence that this 5 December 2013 contract is fraudulent and supported by forged defamatory documents which were uttered while SDK had engaged solicitor Philip Landau with LZW Solicitors in a conspiracy to defraud and defame his USA citizen sponsored Tier 2 foreign worker client. Not employing the Confidentiality terms perverts the course of justice.

Dentons is participating in the violent harassment and fraud against a USA-Thai family and the upstream oil and gas industry through their employment of accused criminal Rhodri Thomas.

Dentons has abrogated their responsibility to clients and stakeholders to conduct responsible due diligence. Dentons is allowing their own reputation and that of partner Rhodri Thomas to be disparaged by taking no action. Such behavior is both repugnant and illegal. They should demand that Thomas and PGS Exploration (UK) Limited exercise the Confidentiality clauses.

Dentons is protecting accused criminal Rhodri Thomas.  Dentons did not complete reasonable due diligence and is aiding and abetting international fraud.  The corrupt UK employment law racket does not want this case to be heard in the English courts because the fraud is easy to detect.  Dentons perverts the course justice.

Workplace Bullying and Bystander Apathy | Claire Hunt | clairehuntonline

###

Categories
Berit Osnes Employment Law Equinor Fraud Gareth Jones Gottfred Langseth Holly Hobson Houston Human Resources John Barnard Jon Erik Reinhardsen Joshua May London Marine Seismic Acquisition Nathan Oliver Norway PGS ASA PGS Exploration (UK) Limited Philip Simon Landau Rob Adams Rune Olav Pedersen Sarah Murphy Settlement Contracts Telenor Weybridge

If a PGS ASA Settlement Contract is Fraudulent

Rune Olav Pedersen Norway PGS ASA CEO & President – PGS Gang Rape

MarineSeismicSurvey.com

SeismicRiskManagement.com

PGS ASA will not Invoke their Contractual Confidentiality terms and conditions that prohibit the publication of content which disparages them, their executives, board of directors, employee’s, customers, and shareholders

PGS ASA will not confront allegations of executive management and board of directors corruption and criminal behavior. Instead, PGS ASA will seek to delete and depublish such allegations while continuing to deceive and rob unwitting stakeholders

PGS ASA will not be led and managed by the ethical best and brightest, but by the mediocre corrupt who view themselves as entitled who can steal and deceive from honest professionals, customers, and shareholders

PGS ASA will destroy the futures and opportunities of their crime victims children and family members

PGS ASA Top Executive will breach published policy and the law with impunity as long as they protect the corrupt Board of Directors and Executive Management

PGS ASA low integrity employee’s bribed through promotions and other gratuity, will obstruct justice and protect and participate in defrauding the upstream oil and gas industry.

###

Categories
Berit Osnes Employment Law Equinor Fraud Gareth Jones Gottfred Langseth Holly Hobson Houston Human Resources John Barnard Jon Erik Reinhardsen Joshua May London Marine Seismic Acquisition Nathan Oliver Norway PGS ASA PGS Exploration (UK) Limited Philip Simon Landau Rob Adams Rune Olav Pedersen Sarah Murphy Settlement Contracts Telenor Weybridge

London Landau Law Bribed by PGS ASA and Watson Farley & Farley to Defraud his Client

~~~~~~~~

Q1 2022 – PGS – Landau Law – WFW

Trustpilot London Landau Law Defamation

pgs asa compliance

MarineSeismicSurvey.com Blogs

pgs asa ceo grievance

Q1 2022 – PGS – Landau Law – WFW

Trustpilot London Landau Law Defamation

London Landau Law Fraud

London-Landau-Law.com Blog

PGS ASA London Law Society Carl Richards

Q1 2022 – PGS – Landau Law – WFW

Eurasia PGS ASA Sarah Murphy

london landau law holly hobson bdbf

pgs asa gareth jones houston weybridge

pgs asa weybridge grievance

pgs asa uk tier 2 visa gareth jones

pgs asa weybridge pedersen langseth steen-nilsen

pgs asa weybridge pedersen langseth steen-nilsen

pgs asa weybridge simon cather sarah murphy

pgs asa weybridge carl richards sarah murphy

pgs asa weybridge candida pinto sarah murphy

london landau law weybridge sarah murphy holly hobson

pgs asa weybridge reinhardsen langseth steen-nilsen

###

Categories
Berit Osnes Employment Law Equinor Fraud Gareth Jones Gottfred Langseth Holly Hobson Houston Human Resources John Barnard Jon Erik Reinhardsen Joshua May London Marine Seismic Acquisition Nathan Oliver Norway PGS ASA PGS Exploration (UK) Limited Philip Simon Landau Rob Adams Rune Olav Pedersen Sarah Murphy Settlement Contracts Telenor Weybridge

Corrupt and Dangerous PGS ASA Invites Shareholder Input on ESG Issues?

pgs asa corrupt investor relations

pgs asa walter qvam jogmec

Cover-up and Fraud

Corrupt and Disfunctional PGS ASA Governance Does Not Respond to Multiple Whistleblower Claims and Withholds Information from Investors.

pgs asa lars mysen thailand extortion

pgs asa US federal crimes

pgs asa uk actionfraud

pgs asa board corruption

telenor silke hitschke pedersen

pgs asa reinhardsen pedersen corruption

pgs asa watson farley & williams neeta auluk

pgs asa landau law corruption

pgs asa walter qvam crimes

pgs asa bullshit governance

equinor jon erik reinhardsen corruption

pgs asa landau law london

pgs asa carl richards watson farley & williams duensing

pgs asa watson farley & williams

pgs asa Duensing Watson Farley & Williams Rhodri Thomas

pgs asa Duensing Carl Richards

pgs asa Duensing Tippaya

pgs asa walter qvam tier 2 landau

pgs asa duensing watson Farley & Williams

pgs asa rune olav pedersen landau law lars mysen

###

Categories
Berit Osnes Employment Law Equinor Fraud Gareth Jones Gottfred Langseth Holly Hobson Houston Human Resources John Barnard Jon Erik Reinhardsen Joshua May London Marine Seismic Acquisition Nathan Oliver Norway PGS ASA PGS Exploration (UK) Limited Philip Simon Landau Rob Adams Rune Olav Pedersen Sarah Murphy Settlement Contracts Telenor Weybridge

PGS ASA: Awarded 4D Contract in GoM

PGS ASA Board of Directors and Executive Management Defraud Stakeholders

pgs asa crimes

Corrupt Corporate Compliance and Bribed Lawyers Obstruct Justice. Demand Documented Answers to Simple Questions!

pgs asa per arild reksnes

pgs asa kristin omreng gareth jones

Some idiotic organization has not performed proper due diligence and hired corrupt and dangerous PGS ASA to conduct a 4D survey in the Gulf of Mexico. PGS Board of Directors and Executive Management need to be investigated for multiple crimes and health and safety violations before stakeholders are placed at risk.

pgs asa wire fraud

pgs asa extortion

pgs asa defamation

pgs asa Bård Stenberg

pgs asa hitschke compliance

pgs asa duensing kippen

pgs asa health & safety

pgs asa bjerke houston wire fraud

###

Categories
Berit Osnes Employment Law Equinor Fraud Gareth Jones Gottfred Langseth Holly Hobson Houston Human Resources John Barnard Jon Erik Reinhardsen Joshua May London Marine Seismic Acquisition Nathan Oliver Norway PGS ASA PGS Exploration (UK) Limited Philip Simon Landau Rob Adams Rune Olav Pedersen Sarah Murphy Settlement Contracts Telenor Weybridge

How Corrupt Bullies and Lawyers Ruined a Marine Geophysical Company

First Published 20 May 2018 on NoPGS.com. PGS ASA cited this article in their criminal defamation claim under Thai law, but not a breach of contract under the laws of England?

Lawyers have their duties as citizens, but they also have special duties as lawyers. Their obligations go far deeper than earning a living as specialists in corporation or tax law. They have a continuing responsibility to uphold the fundamental principles of justice from which the law cannot depart.

Robert Kennedy

The accomplice to the crime of corruption is frequently our own indifference.

Bess Myerson

A blog campaign was initiated on 3 July 2015 against the management of Norwegian based marine seismic services company, Petroleum Geo-Services ASA, Lilleakerveien 4, 0283 Oslo, Norway (PGS), and their UK affiliate PGS Exploration (UK) Limited, 4 The Heights, Brooklands, Weybridge, England, KT13 0NY (PGSUK). On Christmas Eve 2013, I left England with my wife and two children after having signed a settlement contract agreement (SCA). What led to my untimely departure from both England and my PGSUK sponsored job on a Tier 2 visa, was my filing a workplace grievance citing gang-bullying, harassment, abuse of position and breaches in PGSUK written policies, as well as, UK contract and employment laws. In October 2014, citing the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA) and motivated by strange interactions encountered when I returned to Houston, TX, USA, I submitted a subject access request (SAR) to discover what personal data PGSUK was processing about me. When I received and viewed the contents of my PGS personnel file, I was flabbergasted to discover forged documents chronicling events which never occurred and excluding events which did. None of the official records were countersigned by me, and yet they were being processed unabashedly as if they were true and accurate records. I knew something very wrong had happened. After being repeatedly lied to and stonewalled by PGS personnel who processed the SAR, I decided to take the risk and go public with my concerns. Thus began my blog writing campaign. I have written over twenty-five (25) blog articles now which have been less than flattering of the management and directors of PGS/PGSUK. This is all in spite of the fact that the SCA contained a mutual non-disparagement clause whose inclusion into the SCA was specifically demanded and initially one-sided.

Therefore, how could such a fair and legal SCA ever decay into an anti-PGS/PGSUK tirade that has called for the resignation of the CEO and PGS company boycott last for over two-years? Publishing these articles certainly violated the very intention and inclusion of the non-disparagement clause. Over this time, I have only been threatened with legal action twice. The first time was through a letter from David Nicholson, who, at the time, was PGSUK Manager of Human Resources (HR). Nicholson threatened legal action in a letter if I continued my interrogatory about the contents received from my SAR. More recently, and actually ongoing, I have purportedly been contacted by Carl Richards, PGSUK Head of Legal and Company Secretary to end my publications that mention him only. Richards is threatening some defamation claim on foreign soil, Thailand, if I do not discontinue publishing such materials. This “Carl Richards”, has apparently has engaged a Thai law firm, and wants to be identified apart from his professional roles as a Head of Legal and Secretary for an English company. Richards is emphatic about his disassociation from PGS/PGSUK and his fiduciary responsibilities to PGS/PGSUK stakeholders in his personal claim. Also, Richards is not a resident of Thailand, nor does he have any business interests in Thailand, as far as I am aware. Richards seems to have very little faith in any legal solutions at his disposal based on the laws of England through a contract that he oversaw. It is my opinion that Richards wants the “whistleblowing” that connects him directly to what I construe to be an illegal fiasco to end, but does not want to engage or confront the particulars which gave rise to all of the blog post articles. Richards, as with all of those implicated PGS/PGSUK actors live in a mythology where their malfeasance and crimes were never detected. They are all running away from responsibility and accountability, and it is truly a disgusting thing to endure from the standpoint as the target in their ruse.

It should be obvious to all aware stakeholders, especially employees of PGS and its global affiliates, that the SCA, which is the combined product of three (3) legal teams, is not a piece of exemplary legal work. At the center of this peach of a contract, is former General Counsel and Legal Compliance lawyer, Rune Olav Pedersen. Pedersen is now the President and CEO for PGS. This clearly shows that PGS promotes their liabilities rather than deal with them responsibly. Pedersen’s cohort on the PGS Compliance Team was Terje Bjøseth, SVP Global HR. The manipulation of processes and records was a conspiratorial endeavor between PGS Legal and HR to rig a HR solution to protect corrupt bullies within both the HR and Marine Contract Sales – Africa business group. They say that organization culture is promoted through HR. When HR is corrupt, corruption spreads like a cancer throughout the organization. Corrupt and fear-based managed enterprises simply do not perform optimally. In a competitive market, demise over time is predictable. Promoting rogue incompetents into leadership roles only hastens the destruction of ethical value based decision making and professional competence in the workforce. Geoscientists rely on the constancy and understanding of physical laws, which can be examined and exploited to explore and delineate the earths subsurface. Corrupt lawyers and HR rely on the manipulation of civic laws and company policy to preserve an unstable enterprise top-hierarchy selfishly directed with arbitrary caprice.

We do not know what the rules of the game are; all we are allowed to do is to watch the playing. Of course, if we watch long enough, we may eventually catch on to a few of the rules. The rules of the game are what we mean by fundamental physics.

Richard P. Feynman

Other than the laws of physics, rules have never really worked out for me.

Craig Ferguson

Geoscientist and engineers should not tolerate having their profession debased through the toxic machinations of lawyers and HR hacks that divorce themselves from playing by the rules. Our profession demands adherence to physical laws, but its value to customers is only derived through sound and ethical performance and presentation. The overseers of legal and policy compliance proclaim lofty professional standards, but in practice they are hypocritically ignored. The top-tiers of PGS enterprise hierarchy support a toxic, dangerous and corrupt workplace culture that supports the selfish interest of the PGS board of directors and top-management. The top-tier is driven by greed and status above all else. The PGS board of directors and top-management operate oblivious to the damage that they are causing through their recalcitrant posture with regard to health and safety, as well as truth and justice. Their irresponsible silence must be construed as general agreement to the public accusations of fraud and corruption and evidence of self-serving cover-up. Such direction and management is really very destructive to PGS corporate shareholders in the long run. Its impact has been hidden through the current difficult market. This inaction reveals a collective avarice and lack of concern in carrying out prescribed agency responsibilities. Such behaviors are truly disgraceful to intelligent and honorable professionals focused on using their skills to improve products, services, and delivery. Unethical business practices for personal advancement should be unacceptable to all stakeholders, and governing bodies need to do their jobs better.

The Black’s Law Dictionary definition of corruption is, Illegality; a vicious and fraudulent intention to evade the prohibitions of the law. The act of an official or fiduciary person who unlawfully and wrongfully uses his station or character to procure some benefit for himself or for another person, contrary to duty and the rights of others. The vital role for a company secretary is ensuring that the company complies with the law. If the secretary is complicit in a crime committed by the company, they could be disqualified or prosecuted. Confidence fraud involves the breach in a relationship of trust resulting in financial loss. It involves misrepresentation of the truth or the withholding of material facts in order to induce another to act to his detriment. Through the different blog post articles, substantive evidence has been provided which shows that the actions of PGS/PGSUK agents have not complied with either PGSUK company policy or employment law. This was, in fact, the core claim made within the formal grievance which I submitted to PGSUK over four years ago. The bullying and harassment were an abuse of power whereby individuals breached protocols, withheld information, and lied in order to limit my ability to realize my full rights under company policy and UK law. It was all fraud in order to pervert the course of justice. The lies and corruption by those holding fiduciary responsibility have persisted even longer. Why aren’t those with fiduciary duty ever held to account and compelled to answer fully to the numerous public accusations made? Corruption is the only answer.

The collective agents with entrusted responsibility and fiduciary duty bestowed upon them remain silent to the many queries and allegations regarding corrupt and non-compliant business practices. Their collective silence and inaction is a travesty, as well as an abrogation of their fiduciary duties of care and loyalty to all stakeholders. It demonstrates antipathy toward the fair market and its professionals. Simply, these individuals are not fulfilling the duties that they are entrusted to fulfill by agency and title. At the same time, they continue to receive the remuneration and veneration as if they are. They are misleading for personal interest and benefit above stakeholder interests, which is corruption. They are deceiving stakeholders through their lack of honesty and transparency. They are abusing their power categorically. And it matters to me and my family, professional geophysicists and geoscientists, as well as marine seismic market stakeholders at large. Those with entrusted power need to be investigated by a diligent neutral third-party and held to account. It is repugnant to the majority of honorable industry professionals, as well as stakeholders throughout the greater global oil and gas marketplace, that such miscreants have been allowed to damage the reputation and performance of PGS for too long.

For individuals and organizations alike, a reputation is far easier to destroy than it is to build.

Andrew Griffin

A critical ingredient which binds customers to a brand is trust.

Bernard Kelvin Clive

Because the PGS board and top-management take unauthorized agency license and exempt themselves from following enterprise policy and the rules of employment and contract law, the path to a legal and just outcome has become perverted. Through fraudulent and evil practices, corruption and illegality is promoted – to CEO! The processes of legal compliance are being thwarted, in large part, by those in the legal profession who manage over dysfunctional and corrupted enterprise governance practices. Additionally, the corrupt PGS board and management refuse to answer and clarify simple questions regarding legal and policy compliance. Their silence is legal dodge ball, because truthful answers would implicate those with key fiduciary responsibilities directly. The corrupt PGS board and management refuse to fulfill their entrusted fiduciary duties to seek the truth to root out corruption and advance PGS stakeholder interests on a fair and legal playing field. They refuse to take responsibility and answer for decisions made. Most notably, this includes current PGS CEO and President, as well as former General Counsel overseeing legal compliance, Rune Olav Pedersen. Of course, it also includes the former CEO and President of PGS, and sadly, current Statoil Board of Directors Chairman, Jon Erik Reinhardsen, whose irresponsible and corrupt decisions were a product of a toxic, arrogant, and hypocritical management style which defined a debased and opportunistic workplace culture.

The PGS board remains unaccountable, and refuse to clarify points brought-up within the blog posting, Open Letter to the Petroleum Geo-Services ASA Board of Directors (18-Jun-2017), These same base questions were also asked months before within the blog post articles, Petroleum Geo-Services and the Veneer of Governance (8-May-2016), Within the latest post article, Carl Richards’, Secretary, PGS Exploration UK Limited, Silence Implies Agreement and the Abrogation of Fiduciary Duty (20-Apr-2018), the argument is made that the silence and inaction by those with entrusted fiduciary duty implies that the accusations made throughout these blog post articles are indeed true, and argues that the silence is self-serving and meant to protect those implicated ill-deserved status and remuneration from scrutiny and discussion. The allegations of fraud, bribery and embezzlement are backed with evidence. It should be easy to respond to such black and white content and spare the accused any professional embarrassment, as well as quall any doubts that stakeholders might have about the character and values of those leading and managing PGS/PGSUK. It is a failure of the fiduciary duty of loyalty not to defend the reputation of the Company and its agents. Therefore, those with entrusted power are abrogating their fiduciary duties of both care and loyalty to all stakeholders through their continued silence on these matters made public. Industry professionals should pony-up for a classaction suit and demand proof and accountability of legal and compliant behavior. Corrupt organizations weaponize their HR departments to protect corrupt incompetence. The decision for honorable professionals is to demand a fair playing field and to beat the corrupt, rather than join them!

Wherever there is interest and power to do wrong, wrong will generally be done.

James Madison

When whistleblowers come forward, we need to fight for them, so others will be encouraged. When they are gagged, we must be their voice. When they are hunted, we must be their shield. When they are locked away, we must free them. Giving us the truth is not a crime. This is our data, our information, our history. We must fight to own it.

Sara Harrison

PGS/PGSUK has a vested interest in maintaining a false narrative that a disgruntled employee agreed to an SCA to terminate his employment, rather than undergo a performance improvement plan (PIP). But, this is a completely false narrative which is only supported by the illegal forged documents created and being processed by the same persons who, within the pages of a well-documented workplace grievance, pointed out were liars producing defamatory materials and misusing the performance management system! Further, I was a vulnerable foreign worker, a USA citizen being sponsored on a Tier 2 visa by PGSUK in Weybridge, England. I was reliant on the enterprise governance processes of redress to function. I knew it was not functioning within PGSUK, and that was the basis of the formal grievance in the first place. This is why the grievance was to the PGS executives stationed in Norway. In hindsight, I do not believe that any action with regard to my being a target of workplace gang-bullying was handled legally or according to policy. A performance based termination means that PGS/PGSUK misled the UK Border Agency on the application for my Tier 2 visa and dependents. But, there never was a performance problem. This was fabricated to protect corrupt bullies and company directors from accountability for multiple contract and employment law breaches.

I eventually engaged legal advice from Philip Landau and Holly Rushton, who were with Landau, Zeffert, and Weir (LZW). Through the past several months of uncertainty, it now appears clear to me that my legal advisors were compromised (bribed). How is it possible that LZW legal advisors refuse to explain how forged instruments became part of my true and accurate personnel file records under his watch? During the discussions, LZW was provided with a detailed account of events, beyond my grievance document. Yet, only the false narrative supporting the bullies and directors (secretary) narrative reside in my personnel file. They never have communicated that I should stop my publications or provided any comment whatsoever with regard to my many queries. Landau created a new company the month following my signing of the SCA, Landau Law. Rushton followed him there. When I contacted Landau and informed him that I was submitting an SAR ten months later, he never mentioned his new company or queried as to why I was submitting an SAR. I assume that for PGSUK agents to avoid direct communications, PGSUK enlisted employment lawyer, Rhodri Thomas, with Watson, Farley, and Williams (WFW) at the time. I believe that this made it easier for PGS/PGSUK to portray the negotiations and discussion as normal and avoid direct and simple conversation. All the lawyers directly involved in the SCA discussions were playing to the same false narrative. This is gas lighting.

There are some facts that I am certain of, and then there is some speculation. I know, without a doubt, that the contents of my personnel file are neither true nor accurate. I have known this for a long time. The SCA is a legal instrument formed out of data, mostly from personnel files for personnel actions. This means personnel records. My records are incorrect and incomplete. This instrument was crafted for the purpose of advancing a false narrative to support a false claim and subvert the real facts and nature that the grievance brought forth. The SCA discussions lasted from 11-Oct-2013 to 4-Dec-2013. (LZW legal advisers were not officially engaged until 22-Oct2013.) Nicholson, who was deeply implicated in the mismanagement of the performance management system, and also accused of defamation, was actually allowed to proffer the initial SCA. The documents held within my personnel file are the uncorroborated documents created and even signed by Nicholson. My personnel file does not include the Tier 2 visa status documentation. (UK Border Agency data was provided though the SAR.) It should be noted that a different team of WFW lawyers had reviewed and oversaw the processing of the applications for the Tier 2 visa and my dependents. LZW were made aware of an Occupational Health report and diagnosis, which was performed while SCA discussions were underway. However, the final report was withheld from me and removed from my personnel records. Wouldn’t this data be significant for a bullying and harassment claim? Further, these were real true and accurate data. My counter-signature, nor the signature of first line supervisor, von Abendorff, is not on any of the pertinent documents. They are the creation of Nicholson, whom I never worked under directly and who had no first-hand knowledge of my work product or work group contribution. Nicholson oversaw HR staff that processed such glaringly illegal and non-compliant records. Of course, all lawyers and HR personnel directly involved in this conspiracy are now tight-lipped. They are all perverting the course of justice, in my view.

The truth is, one who seeks to achieve freedom by petitioning those in power to give it to him has already failed regardless of the response. To beg for the blessing of “authority” is to accept that the choice is the master’s alone to make, which means that the person is already, by definition, a slave.

Larken Rose

The best way to learn if you can trust somebody is to trust them.

Ernest Hemingway

I never had faith in the grievance process, nor the people controlling it. I did everything within my rights to ensure the process would be as fair as possible. For instance, I made sure that a witness, and UK citizen and worker, was involved. The SCA could have never lasted so long if there were trust. No, the process was intended to drag-out until I capitulated to the lies and torment of an illegally carried-out farce. Unfortunately, my co-worker, John Barnard, turned out to be a stooge who never raised his voice or questioned the process on my behalf. He simply witnessed the destruction of rules and a fellow employee. Barnard should forever be ashamed, and perhaps go to jail, for his cowardice and complicity in the robbery and assault of me and my family. Backstabber Barnard should have never agreed to be my witness. Barnard is a man without honor, as are all who were instrumentally involved in the attempted execution of the character and reputation of a former co-worker. Had the shoe been on the other foot, John, you would have won. Because, I am never intimidated, nor scared, of rule-breaking authority, bullies and liars like Nicholson, Cather and von Abendorff. I never will be. The reason PGS, had to cheat is it was the only way for them to escape accountability and liability. And so the PGS/PGSUK directors remain silent as their executives, as well as the Company’s reputation is tarnished. This is a dereliction of fiduciary duty that damages every aspect of the market, especially its professionals. Shareholders need to care.

So, a person purporting to be Carl Richards, PGSUK Head of Legal and Secretary, is threatening legal action for defamation in Thailand, where I currently reside as a USA citizen with my Thai wife and children. This Carl Richards has never confirmed his identity. The legal firm will not confirm their credentials nor the identity of their client. That’s where we are now. But, the claims made within my blog posts articles have also been shared with UK ActionFraud and the UK Serious Fraud Office. I would like nothing more than for UK legal officials to investigate my claims. There are consequences within the UK legal system for making malicious false claims. Further, and as I have stated previously, the SCA contains clauses to protect from published derogatory statements. As PGSUK secretary, Richards is in charge of making certain that business is carried out legally. So, PGSUK needs to simply show definitive proof that they are processing legal documents as my personnel records. This would be the easiest avenue to ending the online publications. However, this would require Richards wearing his professional hat. But, “Richards” is pursuing his claim on a personal basis, divorced from PGS/PGSUK. He must realize that I am not writing about cross-dressing weekends and drug-laden parties. The published blog articles are written very clearly about Richards professional performance in carrying out his fiduciary responsibilities. I could not care less, nor have I written anything about Richards’ personal life.

None of the published blog articles would have ever been written if the bodies overseeing PGS/PGSUK enterprise governance and legal compliance actually performed the duties which they are legally
entrusted to carry out. Why would lawyers spend weeks parsing out the language of a mutual non-disparagement clause included within an SCA if they were indifferent to having board members, the CEO, and key executives being called liars, cheaters, fraudsters, and assholes? Like my hapless witness, Barnard, even if you do not mind being called such things yourself, what about the majority of stakeholders who prefer not to be associated with these attributes? Whether or not the complainer threatening legal action is the real Carl Richards is almost beside the point. Somebody aligned to Carl Richards’ interests does care. This should be more than enough reason for an attentive board and executive team to be compelled to take action and contract out a thorough and neutral third-party investigation, in lieu of a police investigation. On the central claims made within my blog articles, I have no doubt. I have always invited comment and clarification from those with fiduciary duty with PGS. However, when PGS/PGSUK does not respond to e-mail or online social media, and rather get your means of communication cut-off, it is evident that things are clear enough – too clear! PGS/PGSUK have been naughty, and I have been writing about it. As for Richards, my writing about him is a professional performance appraisal. And it is grounded in substantially more evidence and real data than the one contrived by Nicholson on behalf of PGS/PGSUK. The job of PGS/PGSUK agents is to point out blatant untruths and act on such matters. Their job is to not allow such matters to become personal. That’s what true professionals would do, Carl Richards.

I had requested that defamatory content by von Abendorff, Cather, and Nicholson be expunged. PGS/WFW/LZW lawyers all assured me that it was on 4 December 2013, the day before the SCA was signed:

6) This amendment is not acceptable. PGS’ personnel records are its property and must naturally give an accurate record of all employees’ employment history. It will not agree to redact or amend in anyway.

Why can’t they prove it is true and accurate today?

My original employment contract also states that I CAN amend records that are incorrect. Why was I never allowed to, and why didn’t LZW lawyers request that I inspect and verify the data? LZW lawyers had also been provided the data to be able to conclude that the contents in my personnel file was false.

Professional is not a label you give yourself – it’s a description you hope others will apply to you.

David Maiter

He who threatens us will find us deaf to his threats. We are willing to listen only to rational arguments.

Menachem Begin

###