Employment Solicitor Philip Simon Landau Deceptive Communications

The forged personnel record dated 25 October 2013 states that the Grievance has been concluded?

This forged record was acquired through the submission of a Subject Access Request (SAR) citing the Data Protection Act, October 2015, following the coerced signing of a Termination Settlement Contract, 5 December 2013.

Personnel Records that were obtained a year after these communication through a subject access request citing the Data Protection Act indicate that a Grievance was concluded 25 October 2013. The Memo does not even reference the 20 September 2013 Grievance submitted to the employer and also sent to “Legal Advisor” Philip Simon Landau prior to the 14 October 2013 Grievance Hearing / Meeting attended by Landau’s (future) client.

Landau is participating and a co-conspirator in the fraud to not address censurable conditions such as harassment and discrimination. Landau has also helped the employer to not deal with immigration and Tier 2 sponsorship fraud issues.

There were several communications between the whistleblower and Philip Simon Landau who was hired to help LEGALLY PROCEED through the grievance process on 14 October 2014, the day of the Grievance Hearing!

zzzz

zzz

Uttering forged documents is a crime.

zzzz

zzzz

zzzz

zzzz

zzzz

zzzz

zzzz

zzzz

zzzz

zzzz

zzzz

zzzz

The claims made within the submitted 20 September 2013 grievance were never considered. Subsequent communications with Philip Simon Landau finalized a performance based termination settlement contract that was in addition to being false and defamatory also was much less financially.

zzzz

zzzz